DRAFT: The charter of this project is to identify current and anticipated community of practice requirements for using SCORM. It is intended to clarify the requirements that a "Core SCORM" must support in order to be adapted by multiple communities of practice to meet their particular linguistic, pedagogical, and deployment requirements.
Instructions
LETSI Tech WG members interested in the project:
Please review the draft project charter and initial organizational ideas. Post any comments, including your willingness to participate in this project using the "Add Comment" feature at the bottom of the page
Please note that the following table is a suggestion. Appropriate advocates need to volunteer to participate in the project to represent these or other communities of practice.
Community of Practice
Geography
Advocate
Comment
General - adaptation
Global
TBD
requirements for CoP adaptation
General - legacy support
Global
TBD
requirements for legacy support
ADL
US
TBD
US Government/DoD requirements
AICC
Global
TBD
Commercial Aviation Industry Requirements
Medbiquitous
US
TBD
Healthcare Education
NIME
Japan
TBD
mobile learning
SIFA
US/Europe
TBD
Schools Interoperability Framework
IEEE Computer Society
Global
TBD
Computer Science Profession
Corporate Training
Global
TBD
MASIE Consortium may be a good start
Academia / Higher Ed
Global
TBD
Academia Co-Lab should be able to help identify support
I'll be more than willing to express the needs of the pK-12 community. In terms of geography, we have been working with Australia, Europe and US. ADL might be well versed with the use of SCORM in Korea's schools.
What support do you envision providing to CoP's? Support could range from simply playing the matchmaker to providing online / virtual meeting space, editors, publication possibilities, standardization pathways, etc. The SEC will want to know this, and this is relevant to the decision to go (or not to go) with ISTO.
Posted by
Agree! I'll be happy to be the advocate for Medbiq. --Valerie Smothers